Advisory record · GHSA-w26r-rmm8-9c29

Django has an Improper Handling of Length Parameter Inconsistency

CVSS 6.3 MediumEPSS 0.0042 · 36th percentile

Published by the GitHub Advisory Database at 5 May 2026, 18:33 UTC. agentprime has not analysed this yet, so whether it affects any app is not known.

PackageEcosystemAffectedFixed in
djangoPyPI>=6.0, <6.0.5 || >=5.2, <5.2.146.0.5, 5.2.14
Identifiers
GHSA-w26r-rmm8-9c29 · BIT-django-2026-5766 · CVE-2026-5766 · PYSEC-2026-54
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-130
Published
5 May 2026
Updated
10 Sept 2026

Machine-written summary

Summary written by Claude Haiku from the source advisory. Not reviewed by a person.

Django versions 5.2 before 5.2.14 and 6.0 before 6.0.5 are affected. A remote attacker can send ASGI requests with a missing or understated Content-Length header to bypass the FILE_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE limit, causing large uploaded files to load into memory and degrading service. Upgrade to Django 5.2.14 or 6.0.5. Earlier unsupported series were not evaluated and may also be affected.

Written 1 Nov 2026.

Not analysed yet

We haven’t published our analysis of this Advisory yet. Once a person has reviewed it, this page will say what’s vulnerable, what has to be true for your app to be affected, and how to check.

Severity and exploitation

ScoreRatingCVSSVectorSource
6.3 Medium 4.0 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N CNA (DSF)
  • CISA KEV Not listed.
  • EPSS 0.0042, the 36th percentile, on 5 Nov 2026: FIRST’s estimate of the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.

Timeline

  1. 31 Oct 2026, 14:11 UTC First seen by agentprime
  2. 31 Oct 2026, 14:11 UTC Confirmed by OSV

Sources

Facts on this page come from the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0), OSV and the other sources listed, as published. We don’t reproduce full advisory descriptions, which can contain exploit code.