Not analysed yet
We haven’t published our own analysis of this CVE. If a person reviews it, this page will say what’s affected and what has to be true for it to matter.
Severity and exploitation
| Score | Rating | CVSS | Vector | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | High | 4.0 | CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H | CNA (VulnCheck)Used for this record |
| 7.6 | High | 3.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H | CNA (VulnCheck) |
- CISA KEV Not listed.
- EPSS 0.0021, the 11th percentile, on 5 Nov 2026: FIRST’s estimate of the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Timeline
Sources
References from the CNA
- kb.igel.com/en/security-safety/current/isn-2026-19-code-execution-via-boot-registry
- blog.amberwolf.com/blog/2026/august/thin-client-thin-crypto-overview/
- media.defcon.org/DEF%20CON%2034/DEF%20CON%2034%20presentations/DEF%20CON%2034%20presentations/DEF%20CON%2034%20-%20Darren%20McDonald%20-%20Thin%20Client%20Thin%20Crypto%20-%20Bypassing%20Full-Desk%20Encryption%20Across%20Three%20Major%20Thin%20Clients%20Vendors%20without%20Breaking%20a%20Ci.pdf
- www.vulncheck.com/advisories/igel-os-12-11-boot-registry-parameter-injection-via-unsigned-configuration-area
- github.com/AmberWolfCyber/DEFCON34-ThinClientThinCrypto/blob/main/scripts/igel/inject_bootreg.py