CVE-2026-119420: getlago lago

Lago through 1.55.0 Authentication Bypass via acceptInvite GraphQL Mutation

CVSS 8.7 HighEPSS 0.0039 · 33rd percentile

Published by the CVE Program (CNA: VulnCheck) at 30 Oct 2026, 11:30 UTC. agentprime has not analysed this yet, so whether it affects any app is not known. This CVE names a vendor and product rather than a package, so the lockfile check doesn’t match it.

Affected products, as the CNA wrote them
Vendor	Product	Versions
getlago	lago	affected 1.55.0 and earlier semver Other versions: unaffected

Identifiers

CVE-2026-119420

CNA

VulnCheck

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-288

Not analysed yet

We haven’t published our own analysis of this CVE. If a person reviews it, this page will say what’s affected and what has to be true for it to matter.

Severity and exploitation

Score	Rating	CVSS	Vector	Source
8.7	High	4.0	CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N	CNA (VulnCheck)Used for this record
8.8	High	3.1	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H	CNA (VulnCheck)

CISA KEV Not listed.
EPSS 0.0039, the 33rd percentile, on 5 Nov 2026: FIRST’s estimate of the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.

Timeline

30 Oct 2026, 11:30 UTC Confirmed by the CVE List
30 Oct 2026, 12:16 UTC Confirmed by NVD

Sources

References from the CNA

github.com/getlago/lago-api/commit/5a9d5935b027d1db7171c7c015283d5870451305 patch
github.com/getlago/lago-api/pull/6146 issue-trackingpatch
github.com/getlago/lago-api/blob/v1.55.0/app/services/users_service.rb#L89-L98 technical-description
github.com/getlago/lago-api/blob/v1.55.0/app/services/invites/accept_service.rb#L15-L16 technical-description
abraxaslabs.tech/research/lago-invite-ato third-party-advisory
github.com/getlago/lago-api product
www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lago-through-1.55.0-authentication-bypass-via-acceptinvite-graphql-mutation third-party-advisory

Facts on this page come from the CVE List as the CNA published them, with CVSS from the sources named above, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSS. Vendors, products and versions are shown as the CNA wrote them. We don’t reproduce the CVE’s description.