Not analysed yet
We haven’t published our own analysis of this CVE. If a person reviews it, this page will say what’s affected and what has to be true for it to matter.
Severity and exploitation
| Score | Rating | CVSS | Vector | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.3 | Medium | 4.0 | CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N | CNA (VulnCheck)Used for this record |
| 4.8 | Medium | 3.1 | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N | CNA (VulnCheck) |
- CISA KEV Not listed.
- EPSS 0.0033, the 26th percentile, on 5 Nov 2026: FIRST’s estimate of the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.
Timeline
Sources
References from the CNA
- github.com/duke-git/lancet/issues/356
- github.com/duke-git/lancet/pull/357
- github.com/duke-git/lancet/commit/835111c832939a85416d686a1e99d5fe7060c9b4
- github.com/duke-git/lancet/blob/v2.3.9/netutil/net.go#L192-L205
- github.com/duke-git/lancet/blob/v1.4.6/netutil/net.go#L158-L170
- github.com/duke-git/lancet
- www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lancet-through-2.3.9-ssrf-protection-bypass-via-netutil-isinternalip