CVE-2026-103397: Liquid-co OpenSave

OpenSave before 2.4.0-beta.1 Authentication Bypass via Spoofed Relay Sender

CVSS 6.3 MediumEPSS 0.0022 · 12th percentile

Published by the CVE Program (CNA: VulnCheck) at 30 Sept 2026, 14:48 UTC. agentprime has not analysed this yet, so whether it affects any app is not known. This CVE names a vendor and product rather than a package, so the lockfile check doesn’t match it.

Affected products, as the CNA wrote them
Vendor	Product	Versions
Liquid-co	OpenSave pkg:github/Liquid-co/OpenSave	affected before 2.4.0-beta.1 semver Other versions: unaffected

Identifiers

CVE-2026-103397

CNA

VulnCheck

Weakness (CWE)

CWE-290

Not analysed yet

We haven’t published our own analysis of this CVE. If a person reviews it, this page will say what’s affected and what has to be true for it to matter.

Severity and exploitation

Score	Rating	CVSS	Vector	Source
6.3	Medium	4.0	CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N	CNA (VulnCheck)Used for this record
5.6	Medium	3.1	CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L	CNA (VulnCheck)

CISA KEV Not listed.
EPSS 0.0022, the 12th percentile, on 10 Nov 2026: FIRST’s estimate of the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.

Timeline

This record came from the full history of the CVE Program, published 30 Sept 2026. New records show when each source confirmed them.

Sources

References from the CNA

gist.github.com/mansurmavlankulov/2ca66f95965fb9d4aab353bcf2434cdb third-party-advisory
github.com/Liquid-co/OpenSave/commit/2f2612b13233ac123e01a03cb3008c44bacaeae3 patch
github.com/Liquid-co/OpenSave/blob/v2.3.1/internal/p2p/wanclient_handlers.go#L268-L282 technical-description
github.com/Liquid-co/OpenSave product
www.vulncheck.com/advisories/opensave-before-2.4.0-beta.1-authentication-bypass-via-spoofed-relay-sender third-party-advisory

Facts on this page come from the CVE List as the CNA published them, with CVSS from the sources named above, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSS. Vendors, products and versions are shown as the CNA wrote them. We don’t reproduce the CVE’s description.