CVE-2021-0089: Intel(R) Processors

Intel(R) Processors: Observable response discrepancy in some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authorized user…

No CVSS scoreEPSS 0.0036 · 29th percentile

Published by the CVE Program (CNA: intel) at 9 Jun 2021, 19:07 UTC. agentprime has not analysed this yet, so whether it affects any app is not known. This CVE names a vendor and product rather than a package, so the lockfile check doesn’t match it.

Affected products, as the CNA wrote them
Vendor	Product	Versions
Not given	Intel(R) Processors	affected See references

Identifiers

CVE-2021-0089

CNA

intel

Not analysed yet

We haven’t published our own analysis of this CVE. If a person reviews it, this page will say what’s affected and what has to be true for it to matter.

Severity and exploitation

No source has published a CVSS score for this record yet.

CISA KEV Not listed.
EPSS 0.0036, the 29th percentile, on 5 Nov 2026: FIRST’s estimate of the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days.

Timeline

This record came from the full history of the CVE Program, published 9 Jun 2021. New records show when each source confirmed them.

Sources

References from the CNA

www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00516.html
www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/06/10/1 mailing-listmlist
www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/06/10/10 mailing-listmlist
www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/06/10/11 mailing-listmlist
www.debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4931 vendor-advisorydebian
lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/H36U6CNREC436W6GYO7QUMJIVEA35SCV/ vendor-advisoryfedora
lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SVA2NY26MMXOODUMYZN5DCU3FXMBMBOB/ vendor-advisoryfedora
security.gentoo.org/glsa/202107-30 vendor-advisorygentoo

Facts on this page come from the CVE List as the CNA published them, with CVSS from the sources named above, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSS. Vendors, products and versions are shown as the CNA wrote them. We don’t reproduce the CVE’s description.